Alas, let's look at the numbers. Just for simplicity, I'll use the 2010 numbers as they did in the study as presented yesterday -- no inflation and no population growth. The operating and maintenance costs are projected at $913,000 annually, and the capital (building) costs are projected at $23 million ($23,000,000). The forecasted ridership? 263,000 annually. Is that a good deal? Well, that's $3.47 for every rider at the station just on operating costs. The cash fare is $2.25, so that's clearly not going to cover the cost. (Not to mention that the average fare will be something less than $2.25 due to discounted fares.) And those capital costs? Assuming a 30-year life span, which is probably more than generous, let's add on another $2.32. (Again, I'm not accounting for discounting, but this is a back-of-the-envelope thing.) So that brings us to $5.79 for every rider. Oh my. For far less, we can probably hire cabbies to give them a ride directly to the Howard station (at least if we can get 2 or 3 to share a cab). At least I haven't found that any money has been committed yet -- other than to studies.
Maybe there's some reason why taxpayers should support this kind of mess, but I don't get it. Do you?